公卫人

 找回密码
 立即注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 1795|回复: 0

[英语] NEJM 360:1060-1063, Global Health

[复制链接]
mifeng 发表于 2009-3-12 14:33:23 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

注册后推荐绑定QQ,之后方才可以使用下方的“用QQ帐号登录”。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?立即注册

x
NEJM 360:1060-1063, March 12, 2009: j! q+ o* j: e4 y: m7 D
/ ]$ C, r8 {- K# M& Y
A Lion in Our Village — The Unconscionable Tragedy of Cholera in Africa
$ u4 q: L" ^* y$ T1 v7 T0 `- M; |. H9 W
Eric D. Mintz, M.D., and Richard L. Guerrant, M.D.
% n# I5 i( c+ q0 f( [( k8 z
2 Y. U" U/ w& a. w: Y1 L
2 H  u: m: \+ F/ l' }3 m) f: _; ?/ G
6 p6 \7 F( r- R5 g+ O5 n" LInexcusably, the completely preventable ancient scourge of cholera rages among poverty-stricken and displaced people today, with as many as one in five persons with severe illness dying for lack of safe drinking water and sanitation and a simple therapy consisting of salt, sugar, and water. Cholera, a dreaded waterborne disease of centuries past, remains a troubling barometer — and often a fatal consequence — of inadequate access to safe drinking water and sanitation. Epidemic cholera is the indicator of widespread contamination of drinking water with human feces. As such, it is the bellwether of many less dramatic but equally fatal or disabling diseases that flourish in filth and a litmus test of our willingness to tolerate flagrant violations of the human right to clean water and sanitation.
0 o( w6 q) T) ?- \% [4 A# B/ a
8 S+ e5 {& u$ p8 ?6 @, A8 rMore than 150 years ago in London, an astute physician, John Snow, described the mode of transmission of cholera (nearly 30 years before Robert Koch discovered the causative agent, Vibrio cholerae), and a visionary engineer, Joseph Bazalgette, established an effective means of preventing it: the provision of municipal sanitation. Cholera is thus one of the first infections whose mode of transmission was understood and for which effective prevention measures, collectively referred to as "the sanitary revolution," were developed and implemented. Because of these early observations and interventions, cholera has become vanishingly rare in the United States and other developed countries.
3 [3 W' }  C/ r. |4 C9 o0 p, v7 i. U
In the 1960s, the continued flourishing of cholera in its endemic home of South Asia inspired the treatment revolution of oral rehydration therapy (ORT). ORT has dramatically reduced cholera's case fatality rate, which was once more than 30%, to less than 1% in South Asia and has prevented millions of deaths worldwide. In the 1990s, when epidemic cholera returned to Latin America after a century-long absence, governments, United Nations agencies, and the private sector reacted swiftly with investments in health care, drinking water, and sanitation. These concerted efforts, which drew from the sanitary and treatment revolutions, kept mortality below 1% and reduced the number of cases from more than 1 million in the 1990s to fewer than 5000 in the new millennium.1 Notable decreases in the rates of typhoid fever, hepatitis A, and overall infant mortality soon followed. Together, these two revolutions should have relegated cholera to the history books. However, neither the sanitary revolution nor the treatment revolution has been fully realized in Africa, where illness rates and mortality are soaring for lack of water, sanitation, salt, and sugar.1; B5 {% V5 ~2 B  S2 [" S, b

* y( O! F7 H0 \) c  b" mSince we understand the transmission, prevention, and treatment of cholera so well, the disease poses little risk to people of means, even in the poorest societies. Treated bottled or running water, soap or hand sanitizer, and private flush toilets are available in every city in the world, though their price is often beyond the reach of the general population. Travelers to countries where cholera is endemic or epidemic may purchase further protection through immunization for a fraction of their plane fare. If infected, people with cash or credit can easily obtain effective therapies, such as ORT and antimicrobial agents.! I0 a6 Q% N8 C6 S3 r8 a
3 V7 m. l) D! P4 ^3 ~
Unlike the severe acute respiratory syndrome, avian influenza, and other infectious-disease threats that have emerged recently, cholera is easily avoided and easily treated. The failure of the global community to mobilize the resources needed to prevent and to treat cholera among the less fortunate reflects our lack of commitment to equity and social justice. Improving access to safe drinking water, adequate sanitation, and basic health services are among the core Millennium Development Goals agreed to by all United Nations member states.
$ q6 J* G6 Z- E3 }( _( {
; d% E4 k8 G; AEpidemic cholera represents a fundamental failure of governance, and bold and visionary leadership is required if we are to attack its root causes. Such leadership has been demonstrated in other contexts in Africa. For example, President Yoweri Museveni of Uganda began to change public attitudes toward the human immunodeficiency virus and succeeded in reducing the rates of AIDS in his country, in part by recharacterizing the disease as similar to any other threat to the community: "When a lion comes into your village," he said, "you must raise the alarm loudly."! t" j5 ^2 O8 U- D
: }6 H: k% j  w+ B6 ?
It is time to sound the alarm again. Whereas reported case fatality rates for cholera in the rest of the world are now well below 1%, rates in excess of 5% are still commonly reported in many African countries.1 According to United Nations agencies, the cumulative case fatality rate in the ongoing cholera epidemic in Zimbabwe remained stubbornly above 4.7% through February 12, 2009, by which point 5 months had elapsed since the epidemic began, and more than 73,000 cases and 3500 deaths had been reported (see graph and slide show). The epidemic in Zimbabwe shows no signs of waning and has spread to neighboring South Africa and Zambia, causing thousands of additional cases. Unrelated epidemics in more than a dozen countries in sub-Saharan Africa within the past year have caused nearly 100,000 illnesses and well over 1000 deaths.
! Y. P5 Z2 y3 E% k3 Z
1 e& l  x3 S) |$ u  d& `Just as the many cholera cases reported in Africa reflect a lack of access to safe drinking water and proper sanitation, the high death rate underlines a lack of access to basic health care services and supplies. Worrisome declines have been documented in the proportion of African children who receive ORT and continued breast-feeding or other types of feeding for routine management of diarrheal diseases.2 Wider availability and use of ORT and effective adjunct therapies (such as oral zinc, which reduces the illness duration and stool output) could prevent many deaths from cholera and other diarrheal diseases in Africa.3 Beyond the immediate threat of death lies the menace of the silent, long-term effect of repeated or persistent diarrheal illnesses that impair the physical and cognitive development of impoverished children, who may be robbed of intellectual potential — up to 10 IQ points, according to some estimates — by the lack of safe water and sanitation.46 a# Z2 K' J+ W5 a

  v. M) i5 b5 [4 F, O! D1 z3 `/ a' KAlthough it is clear that resources and political will must be mobilized to bring the sanitary and treatment revolutions to sub-Saharan Africa, critical questions remain about cholera prediction, prevention, and response in Africa. We are only beginning to understand the interactive microbial and societal virulence factors that influence the spread of V. cholerae. Recently shed vibrios, for example, appear to be substantially more infectious than those that have adapted to their aquatic environment — a finding that highlights the importance of disruptions in water and sanitation. Rising water temperatures, which lead to plankton blooms, may increase the prevalence of vibrios in the natural environment and the risk of epidemic cholera in areas where drinking water is obtained from untreated surface sources. Vibriophage, on the other hand, may dampen an epidemic and might provide a biologic tool for epidemic control. Inexpensive techniques for household water treatment (including point-of-use chlorination, filtration, and solar disinfection) can prevent cholera and other waterborne diseases but have not been scaled up to reach the hundreds of millions of people who could benefit from them while awaiting access to piped treated water. An oral cholera vaccine is widely marketed, but despite a successful field trial in Mozambique,5 the number of doses, time required to engender protective immunity, short duration of protection, and cost have limited its usefulness in epidemic response and in the control of endemic disease. A less expensive and simpler single-dose formulation of this vaccine is currently in field trials.4 ?; ^* l; z6 O5 c

, Y6 ~; F$ L% W. m4 E& V6 _In 2005, the reported incidence of cholera in Africa was 95 times that in Asia and 16,600 times that in Latin America. In 2007, the reported rate of death from cholera in Africa was seven times that in Asia; no cholera-related deaths have been reported in Latin America since 2001.1 These preventable cases and deaths result from a lack of essential infrastructure, inadequate health care delivery, and the failure of the global community to muster the political will necessary to extend the benefits of the sanitary and treatment revolutions to all people. The lion is in our human village, and we must do more than sound the alarm.

评分

参与人数 1钢镚 +5 收起 理由
forrestlin + 5 我很赞同

查看全部评分

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

手机版|会员|至尊|接种|公卫人 ( 沪ICP备06060850号-3 )

GMT+8, 2024-5-20 15:37 , Processed in 0.052734 second(s), 8 queries , Gzip On, MemCached On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表