- 积分
- 15723
好友
记录
日志
相册
回帖0
主题
分享
精华
威望 旺
钢镚 分
推荐 人
|
注册后推荐绑定QQ,之后方才可以使用下方的“用QQ帐号登录”。
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?立即注册
×
Volume 377, Issue 9771, 26 March 2011-1 April 2011, Page 1059
A thank you to all our peer reviewers in 2010
Sabine Kleinerta
Today we publish as a webappendix our annual list of clinical and statistical peer reviewers from many different countries and specialties who helped us choose and improve papers in 2010. Those who reviewed more than five
papers are marked with an asterisk. By publishing their names, we hope that some small recognition of an important academic task can be given to those who give their time, knowledge, and expertise. While the academic community ponders on the best way to do peer review, a much more urgent question for those who design research assessment exercises is: how can this time-consuming yet undervalued activity be more formally appreciated and incorporated into the assessment of an academic's work? As journal editors, we highly regard and respect our trusted reviewers. Thank you all!
大家辨识下!
|
-
-
mmc1.pdf
472.46 KB, 下载次数: 25, 下载积分: 钢镚 -1 分, 参与 1 贴
|